Yes, you are right.
Best,
Jianyin
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:11 AM, Sander B. <bs3e09.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> I understand what you say regarding the way frames are read in. But just to
> confirm: If I read in 500 single snapshots as described, it is correct that
> the first "X" is definitely the first snapshot read in and the second "X" is
> the second snapshot and so on. So I can say that if
>
> cluster0 XXX..............
> cluster1 ......XX..........
>
> snapshots 500, 510 and 520 are definitely in cluster 0?
>
> Is the same true if I read in the frames like this:
>
> trajin Trajectory_file 500 5490 10 ?
>
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Sat Jun 11 2011 - 00:00:03 PDT
