Custom Search
-- Paul Rigor http://www.ics.uci.edu/~prigor On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Paul Rigor <paul.rigor.uci.edu> wrote: > Hi gang, > > So I'm still checking with our system admin, I still do not see the > cuda_parallel target, just serial, parallel and cuda. So we probably don't > have the latest sources? In any case, here are the logs for the serial and > mpi versions of amber. I've made sure to patch and also clean up before > running their respective make target. > > I'll keep you posted on the cuda and cuda_parallel builds for SDK 4.0 (and > 3.2). > > Thanks, > Paul > > > > -- > Paul Rigor > http://www.ics.uci.edu/~prigor > > > > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Ross Walker <ross.rosswalker.co.uk>wrote: > >> > > Yes it does. Line 45 of $AMBERHOME/src/Makefile >> > > >> > > cuda_parallel: configured_cuda configured_parallel clean $(NETCDFLIB) >> > > .echo "Starting installation of ${AMBER} (cuda parallel) at >> > `date`". >> > > cd pmemd && $(MAKE) cuda_parallel >> > > >> > > Something smells fishy with your copy of AMBER 11 to me if it is >> > missing >> > > this. >> > > >> > >> > Could be unpatched. I don't think we had cuda_parallel at Amber11 >> > release, right? >> >> But how would he get any parallel version compiled??? - Or maybe it is >> just >> the serial version linked with MPI. Ugh... >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> AMBER mailing list >> AMBER.ambermd.org >> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber >> > >