Thanks for the info.
Lekpa
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Thomas Cheatham III <tec3.utah.edu> wrote:
>
> > Is there any sense to time at all in the output? What I mean is looking
> at
>
> Yes, that is a schematic as a function of time (x-axis)...
>
> > the output given below, does it mean that clusters 2 and 3 are the main
> > clusters AFTER a time when the structure is mostly close to cluster 1?
>
> Initially the trajectory is in cluster zero and moves to cluster 1, then
> primarily swaps between 2 and 3 (with brief visits back to 1)
>
> > #Cluster 0 6 ..
> > #Cluster 1 3X9992 .X95 . .
> > #Cluster 2 ....2 .365799652.59789898727886888767887666886
> > #Cluster 3 .7997 ..342..34794.21.1.1272113111232112333113
>
> time ----------->
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed May 11 2011 - 12:00:06 PDT
