> Is there any sense to time at all in the output? What I mean is looking at
Yes, that is a schematic as a function of time (x-axis)...
> the output given below, does it mean that clusters 2 and 3 are the main
> clusters AFTER a time when the structure is mostly close to cluster 1?
Initially the trajectory is in cluster zero and moves to cluster 1, then
primarily swaps between 2 and 3 (with brief visits back to 1)
> #Cluster 0 6 ..
> #Cluster 1 3X9992 .X95 . .
> #Cluster 2 ....2 .365799652.59789898727886888767887666886
> #Cluster 3 .7997 ..342..34794.21.1.1272113111232112333113
time ----------->
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed May 11 2011 - 12:00:04 PDT
