Re: [AMBER] question about scmask

From: Lishan Yao <yaolisha.msu.edu>
Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 17:29:43 +0800

Dear Amber users,

    I set up a alchemy simulation for the GTG to GAG mutation in water (with head and tail groups neutralized). Following the typical procedure, I did electrostatics first and then vdw. In the vdw alchemy process, I used softcore method. But I got very different dv/dl values when I use

scmask=':3.CB,HB,CG2,HG21,HG22,HG23,OG1,HG1' for GTG and scmask=':3.CB,HB1,HB2,HB3' for GAG
or
scmask=':3.HB,CG2,HG21,HG22,HG23,OG1,HG1' for GTG and scmask=':3.HB1,HB2,HB3' for GAG

I can't figure out what is the problem. It seems to me they should give same or at least similar results.

Best,
Lishan
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Thu May 05 2011 - 02:30:02 PDT
Custom Search