Both.
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 1:29 PM, serena_leone.libero.it <
serena_leone.libero.it> wrote:
> Dear prof. Case,
>
> thank you for your answer. Is this valid for sander in both Amber10 and
> Amber11 or just in the latter version?
>
> Thank you again,
> Serena
>
> >----Messaggio originale----
> >Da: case.biomaps.rutgers.edu
> >Data: 16/02/2011 18.14
> >A: "serena_leone.libero.it"<serena_leone.libero.it>, "AMBER Mailing List"
> <amber.ambermd.org>
> >Ogg: Re: [AMBER] V5 dihedrals
> >
> >On Wed, Feb 16, 2011, serena_leone.libero.it wrote:
> >>
> >> I would like to know if Sander in Amber10 or Amber11 can handle dihedral
> >> potentials described with additional coefficients in a frcmod file
> (i.e.,
> V5
> >> besides V1, V2, V3 and V4).
> >
> >As far as I can see, there is no problem with sander (or with pmemd). The
> >nmode and nab codes need an update, which we are working on.
> >
> >...dac
> >
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
--
Jason M. Swails
Quantum Theory Project,
University of Florida
Ph.D. Candidate
352-392-4032
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed Feb 16 2011 - 11:30:02 PST
