Re: [AMBER] error in atomic charge calculation in RED server

From: Chinh Su Tran To <chinh.sutranto.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 15:36:40 +0800

Thanks a lot, Francois :)

Chinh

On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 3:30 PM, FyD <fyd.q4md-forcefieldtools.org> wrote:

> Chinh Su,
>
> > I saw all the example files with around 25
> > atoms, is it the maximum number of atoms I should limit for each
> submitted
> > input file?
>
> When you want to derive RESP charges, you could have two main limits:
> - that in the QM program;
> as you use Gaussian see
> http://www.gaussian.com/g_tech/g_ur/b_proglimits.htm
> - that used in the fitting step.
> We use an adapted RESP version by now (see
> http://q4md-forcefieldtools.org/RED/resp/) and the boundaries (number
> of constraints, no molecules etc..) for the fit have been pushed back.
>
> Around 100 atoms for this type of complex is acceptable - when you use
> HF or DFT; at least on our hardware ;-)
>
> regards, Francois
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Tue Oct 12 2010 - 01:00:07 PDT
Custom Search