[AMBER] Protocol for structure determination of DNA duplex by NMR

From: Olivier Julien <ojulien.ualberta.ca>
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 11:53:23 -0600

Hi,

I am a PhD student and I am pursuing the structure determination of a DNA duplex
dodecamer by NMR. I am comparing a DNA duplex containing a modified base,
in comparison to a control. I used antechamber and leap. Everything works great so far.

I also used MARDIGRAS to calibrate the NOEs, and use standard Watson-Crick hbonds to
keep the strands together. I used loose sugar angles based on J-coupling measurements.
I back-calculated my NOESY spectrum based on the calculated structure and it fits very well.

QUESTION #1:
I am using the following backbone dihedral angles typical for B-DNA (+/- 40 degrees):
(Bax et al., 1DUF.pdb)
        $alpha = -61; $beta = 180; $gamma = 57;
        $delta = 123; $epsi = -169; $zeta = -91;
Does this seem appropriate?
More importantly, how are the dihedral angles defined? Between -180 to +180? between -360 to +360?
Would -60 = 300 degrees?
If one look at http://ambermd.org/tutorials/advanced/tutorial4/files/5col.bb
Is 2 CYT EPSILN -240.0 10.0 = -115 +/- 125 ?

QUESTION #2:
I used a very similar GB anneal protocol to the one describe by Ross Walker in one of his tutorial (see below).
I repeated the protocol 50 times using a different seed number to obtain a NMR ensemble,
and kept the 10 lowest energy (or 10 lowest rmsd) structures as representative ensemble.

I only have a few violations. e.g.:
                                       Total distance penalty: 2.176
                                       Total torsion penalty: 0.014

Does the protocol I am using here seems correct?
Should I do a minimization after? Or is this sufficient?

I would appreciate any comments.

Olivier




# simulated annealing protocol, 30 ps

 &cntrl
    nstlim=30000, pencut=-0.001, nmropt=1,
    ntpr=200, ntt=1, ntwx=200, tempi=10,
    cut=12.0, ntb=0, vlimit=10, rgbmax=12.0,
    igb=1, saltcon=0.1, offset=0.13, ig=$seed
 /
 &ewald
 /
#
#Simple simulated annealing algorithm:
#
#from steps 0 to 5000: heat the system to 600K
#from steps 5001-18000: re-cool to low temperatures with long tautp
#from steps 18001-20000: final cooling with short tautp
#
 &wt type='TEMP0', istep1=0,istep2=5000,value1=600.,
            value2=600., /
 &wt type='TEMP0', istep1=5001, istep2=18000, value1=600.0,
            value2=100.0, /
 &wt type='TEMP0', istep1=18001, istep2=30000, value1=0.0,
            value2=0.0, /

 &wt type='TAUTP', istep1=0,istep2=5000,value1=0.4,
            value2=0.4, /
 &wt type='TAUTP', istep1=5001,istep2=18000,value1=4.0,
            value2=4.0, /
 &wt type='TAUTP', istep1=18001,istep2=19000,value1=1.0,
            value2=1.0, /
 &wt type='TAUTP', istep1=19001,istep2=30000,value1=0.1,
            value2=0.05, /

 &wt type='REST', istep1=0,istep2=3000,value1=0.1,
            value2=1.0, /
 &wt type='REST', istep1=3001,istep2=30000,value1=1.0,
            value2=1.0, /

 &wt type='END' /
                                                                                                                  
LISTOUT=gb_$i.viol
DISANG=all.rst
                                                                                                                  
/


_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed Oct 06 2010 - 11:00:03 PDT
Custom Search