Re: [AMBER] parmbsc0

From: case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 18:21:31 -0400

On Tue, Aug 17, 2010, Jason Swails wrote:
>
> Small question about parmbsc0 parameters: why is the mass of CI 12.001
> instead of 12.01 (like every other carbon in parm99)? CI also has mass
> 12.01 in parm10.dat ...

Typo...fixed in git....dac


_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Tue Aug 17 2010 - 15:30:05 PDT
Custom Search