Re: [AMBER] ambertools 1.4, tests

From: Mengjuei Hsieh <mjhsieh.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 15:39:05 -0700

On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 6:53 AM, Ben Roberts <roberts.qtp.ufl.edu> wrote:
> I think -g might do more than just turn off optimisations. It also often mucks about with the memory layout. Sigh - I hate Heisenbugs.
> I'm willing to help diagnose the problem - time permitting. So we can coordinate our efforts, what might be most helpful for me to try first?

So far we are not able to pinpoint where the problem is, inside the
pbsa interface I found that the pbopt settings are incorrect even
inside the pboptinit(). I already fixed a problem of allocation (see
the gist I posted earlier today), but unfortunately it doesn't solve
the problem. (If I only compiled pboptinit() with "-g", it's still not
working.) I am suspecting some kind of alignment problem, probably
not right on the spot of pboptinit.

Perhaps I need to use valgrind more..
-- 
Mengjuei
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Mon May 03 2010 - 16:00:03 PDT
Custom Search