On Mon, May 03, 2010, Ben Roberts wrote:
> >> Like Alan, I upgraded to 11.1.088, and I'm running OS X 10.6.3. I see
> >> the same bugs in AmberTools that he did.
> >
> To put the cat among the pigeons some more, Amber serial is presenting me with problems too:
>
> cd gact_ips && ./Run.ipsnve
> forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV, segmentation fault occurred
>
> cd gact_ips && ./Run.ips_dfft
> forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV, segmentation fault occurred
>
> cd gact_ips && ./Run.ips_vacuum
> forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV, segmentation fault occurred
>
> cd newton_raph && ./Run.newton_raph
> diffing nmd_min.out.save with nmd_min.out
> possible FAILURE: check nmd_min.out.dif
> (on inspection, many numerical differences)
Hi Ben:
On the Amber wiki, you reported mostly good results for these tests:
BPR: Mac OS 10.6.3; Intel 11.1.084; MKL; x86_64; OpenMPI 1.4.1; RC 18apr10
Do you know what is different between now and then? I guess it could be
the small tweak in the compiler, from 084 to 088(?). [It *is* true that my
Intel compiler tests never went past 11.1.069.]
...thx...dac
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Mon May 03 2010 - 08:30:03 PDT
