Re: [AMBER] ambertools 1.4, tests

From: case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu>
Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 11:02:58 -0400

On Mon, May 03, 2010, Ben Roberts wrote:

> >> Like Alan, I upgraded to 11.1.088, and I'm running OS X 10.6.3. I see
> >> the same bugs in AmberTools that he did.
> >
> To put the cat among the pigeons some more, Amber serial is presenting me with problems too:
>
> cd gact_ips && ./Run.ipsnve
> forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV, segmentation fault occurred
>
> cd gact_ips && ./Run.ips_dfft
> forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV, segmentation fault occurred
>
> cd gact_ips && ./Run.ips_vacuum
> forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV, segmentation fault occurred
>
> cd newton_raph && ./Run.newton_raph
> diffing nmd_min.out.save with nmd_min.out
> possible FAILURE: check nmd_min.out.dif
> (on inspection, many numerical differences)

Hi Ben:

On the Amber wiki, you reported mostly good results for these tests:

BPR: Mac OS 10.6.3; Intel 11.1.084; MKL; x86_64; OpenMPI 1.4.1; RC 18apr10

Do you know what is different between now and then? I guess it could be
the small tweak in the compiler, from 084 to 088(?). [It *is* true that my
Intel compiler tests never went past 11.1.069.]

...thx...dac


_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Mon May 03 2010 - 08:30:03 PDT
Custom Search