> I believe the go command is really only of any use when you are running
> ptraj interactively, as opposed to feeding it a script on standard in. If
> you run it interactively I think you can just queue up commands by typing
> them and it only runs when you type go. This is as opposed to when you feed
> it a script in which the 'go' is effectively implicit when it gets to the
> end of the piped file.
Yes, Ross has it right; also, you cannot do two sets of commands in
one script such as:
trajin foo
trajout bar
rms first mass
go
trajin bar
trajout bar.nowat
strip :WAT
go
(The "go" was there for interactive use; you could simply type <ctrl>-D
instead as well, but many interactive users do not realize <ctrl>-D means
EOF)
--tom
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Fri Apr 30 2010 - 09:00:03 PDT