Hi, Age,
The definition of hbond that you used in ptraj and vmd may be different. You
may check it first.
Good luck
shulin
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 12:45 PM, <Age.Skjevik.biomed.uib.no> wrote:
>
>
> Dear AMBER users,
>
> I have run the ptraj hbond analysis on a couple of my simulations using a
> distance cut-off of 3.5 Å and the default angle cut-off of 120 degrees.
> However, it resulted in somewhat higher % occupancies than expected from
> examining the trajectory closely in VMD. In several of the cases, the
> hydrogen in my secondary amine (acceptor) is oriented away from, rather than
> towards, the oxygen donor most of the time. In the hbond analysis, however,
> it seems that it is still treated as a hydrogen bond as long as the distance
> is below 3.5 Å. My question is whether the hbond analysis takes into
> consideration the
> direction of the hydrogen?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Åge Skjevik, University of Bergen, Norway
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Mon Sep 14 2009 - 13:35:59 PDT
