Re: [AMBER] PMEMD vs GROMACS?

From: Vlad Cojocaru <Vlad.Cojocaru.eml-r.villa-bosch.de>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:46:36 +0100

Sorry, I missed the amber and charmm force field ports for GROMACS...

vlad

Hannes Loeffler wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 09:24 +0100, Vlad Cojocaru wrote:
>
>> In GROMACS you cannot use neither charmm,
>> nor amber force fields unless you implement it yourself.
>>
>
> Both force fields are available for GROMACS
> http://chemistry.csulb.edu/ffamber/
> http://www.dbb.su.se/User:Bjelkmar/Ffcharmm
>
> There is also a topology converter from AMBER to GROMACS.
> http://chemistry.csulb.edu/ffamber/amb2gmx.pl
>
> Don't know how well this works but it is there.
>
>
> Hannes.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
>

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Vlad Cojocaru
EML Research gGmbH
Schloss-Wolfsbrunnenweg 33
69118 Heidelberg
Tel: ++49-6221-533202
Fax: ++49-6221-533298
e-mail:Vlad.Cojocaru[at]eml-r.villa-bosch.de
http://projects.villa-bosch.de/mcm/people/cojocaru/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
EML Research gGmbH
Amtgericht Mannheim / HRB 337446
Managing Partner: Dr. h.c. Klaus Tschira
Scientific and Managing Director: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Andreas Reuter
http://www.eml-r.org
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber

Received on Wed Feb 25 2009 - 01:17:32 PST