Re: [AMBER] PMEMD vs GROMACS?
This message
: [
Message body
] [ More options (
top
,
bottom
) ]
Related messages
: [
Next message
] [
Previous message
] [
In reply to
] [
Next in thread
] [
Replies
]
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
From
: Hannes Loeffler <
hannes.loeffler.stfc.ac.uk
>
Date
: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:39:29 +0000
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 09:24 +0100, Vlad Cojocaru wrote:
> In GROMACS you cannot use neither charmm,
> nor amber force fields unless you implement it yourself.
Both force fields are available for GROMACS
http://chemistry.csulb.edu/ffamber/
http://www.dbb.su.se/User:Bjelkmar/Ffcharmm
There is also a topology converter from AMBER to GROMACS.
http://chemistry.csulb.edu/ffamber/amb2gmx.pl
Don't know how well this works but it is there.
Hannes.
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on
Wed Feb 25 2009 - 01:17:26 PST
This message
: [
Message body
]
Next message
:
Vlad Cojocaru: "Re: [AMBER] About the croase grainded FF"
Previous message
:
Vlad Cojocaru: "Re: [AMBER] PMEMD vs GROMACS?"
In reply to
:
Vlad Cojocaru: "Re: [AMBER] PMEMD vs GROMACS?"
Next in thread
:
Vlad Cojocaru: "Re: [AMBER] PMEMD vs GROMACS?"
Reply
:
Vlad Cojocaru: "Re: [AMBER] PMEMD vs GROMACS?"
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
Custom Search