Dear all,
I read previous posts discussing ntt=3 or 1 for NPT simulation. I performed a 30-ns npt trajectory using ntt=3 and ig=default at each restart (1.6 ns per segment) to monitor the conformational dynamics of a protein system. But some posts have mentioned that IG should change its value at each restart otherwise artiactual behavior can be observed. I'd like to know more in detail about how ig=default at each restart will effect my observation when I only concern on the conformational dynamics? Should I rerun the simulation from just the starting model?
Many thanks.
----
Jeffrey
I pasted here one of the relating posts by Bob.
---------
Germain -
ig is used for computing random velocities during a restart that does NOT
have velocity information (eg., from a minimization), and for the andersen
and langevin thermostats (ntt 2, 3 respectively). You can get artifactual
behaviour in the thermostats if you use the same seed in restarts, as you
need to be effectively sampling from a gaussian distribution over the entire
run, not resampling from the same sequence of pseudorandom numbers
repeatedly. So in using these thermostats it is important to be careful
about changing the value of ig through your restarts, or strange things can
happen. There is a facility in sander to use the system clock to get the
random seed, probably only in amber 10 (sorry, I don't have amber 10 doc
available at the moment), and don't see it described in 9). I don't have
this capability in pmemd yet. The best way to do this stuff is to carry the
state of the rng forward between restarts; I plan to do that in pmemd in the
future.
Regards - Bob Duke
__________________________________________________
¸Ï¿ì×¢²áÑÅ»¢³¬´óÈÝÁ¿Ãâ·ÑÓÊÏä?
http://cn.mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Fri Feb 20 2009 - 01:08:00 PST