Re: [AMBER] array out of bound in Amber10 tests

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Carlos Simmerling <carlos.simmerling.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:38:04 -0500

I would suggest remd.f as the first one to try.

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Shan-ho Tsai <tsai.hal.physast.uga.edu> wrote:
>
> optimization (-O) and still got wrong results for this test. Now,

_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Sun Feb 15 2009 - 01:10:14 PST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Daniel Smith: "Re: [AMBER] Solvating the interior of a channel"
Previous message: Hannes Loeffler: "Re: [AMBER] projections of trajectories onto the first 2 principal eigenvectors"
In reply to: Shan-ho Tsai: "Re: [AMBER] array out of bound in Amber10 tests"
Next in thread: Shan-ho Tsai: "Re: [AMBER] array out of bound in Amber10 tests"
Reply: Shan-ho Tsai: "Re: [AMBER] array out of bound in Amber10 tests"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

Custom Search