I don't know of gromos input files for AMber, but much recent work has
shown the Amber ff99SB force field for proteins to be superior to
gromos96. I would try to use ff99SB if possible, especially since it
is well tested with the amber codes.
your second question is not very clear, can you explain more about
what you want to do? are you trying to mix force field components for
different parts of your system?
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Chih-Ying Lin <chihying.usc.edu> wrote:
>
> Hi
> I know the force field (FF) parameters from Amber can port to Gromacs.
>
> But, could anyone know if Gromos 96 could port to Amber?
>
>
> In Amber, one set of FF parameters determine one bond/ one angle/ one dihedral.
> Could I use more sets of FF parameters to describe one bond / one angle/ one dihedral?
>
> If so, please tell me how to do so.
>
> Thanks
> Lin
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> The AMBER Mail Reflector
> To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" (in the *body* of the email)
> to majordomo.scripps.edu
>
--
===================================================================
Carlos L. Simmerling, Ph.D.
Associate Professor Phone: (631) 632-1336
Center for Structural Biology Fax: (631) 632-1555
CMM Bldg, Room G80
Stony Brook University E-mail: carlos.simmerling.gmail.com
Stony Brook, NY 11794-5115 Web: http://comp.chem.sunysb.edu
===================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" (in the *body* of the email)
to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Sun Aug 24 2008 - 06:07:17 PDT
