Re: AMBER: Compilation of amber8 patched with ramd

From: David A. Case <case.scripps.edu>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:06:15 -0700

On Tue, Jun 24, 2008, Francesco Pietra wrote:

> Running the general serial test for amber8, all PASSED except
> newton_raph (forrtl: severe (174) segmentation fault). That likely
> because no bugfix was applied (and it can't) to amber8 before patching
> with ramd. I was unable to trace what newton_raph is expected to do,
> so that may I ask whether this is a problem for running ramd?

As I understand it, RAMD is a modification to *sander*, and newton_raph
is an *nmode* test. They are complete separate executables.

...dac

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" (in the *body* of the email)
      to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Wed Jun 25 2008 - 06:07:53 PDT
Custom Search