You were exactly right. Now that I'm calling the correct version of ptraj,
it works perfectly fine. Isn't my face red? Thank you very much, Dr. Case.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-amber.scripps.edu [mailto:owner-amber.scripps.edu] On Behalf Of
David A. Case
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 11:18 AM
To: amber.scripps.edu
Subject: Re: AMBER: "Dumping RAW 2D RMS data is not yet implemented"?
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008, Steve Spronk wrote:
> When I grep for "RAW 2D RMS" in any of the ptraj
> programs, nothing is found. When I grep "not implemented" in the ptraj
> programs, there are four lines found but none of them are related at all
to
> the 2D rms data.
Sounds like you are still running Amber9 ptraj (or some other earlier
version). The phrase "RAW 2D RMS" *is* present in the amber9 sources (in a
message saying that this is not yet implemented), but is no longer present
in
AmberTools sources.
Check your PATH variable, or type "which ptraj".
...dac
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" (in the *body* of the email)
to majordomo.scripps.edu
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" (in the *body* of the email)
to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Wed Jun 18 2008 - 06:07:52 PDT
