Also, keeping nstlim at 30000 means that an exchange will be attempted
ONLY after 30000 steps, so you would not gain anything
against the same time for MD.
I think you should use nstlim ~ 500 or 1000 (amber 10 should allow you
to use much lower nstlim without getting hit on performance)
One more thing, if you are able to recompile amber yourself, I recommend
you add
-DNO_DETAILED_TIMINGS to the AMBERFLAGS in config.h). This helps with
less writing and accelerates REMD potentialy quite a bit.
Adrian
Carlos Simmerling wrote:
> you cannot use constant pressure for REMD in Amber. Check the work by Garcia
> on
> constant P REMD, there are many issues to consider. The most obvious is that
>
> at the high temperatures in REMD, the water will vaporize at 1atm.
> Additionally, one
> needs to consider pressure in the exchange calculation.
> different ntt values should be fine, as long as you use a thermostat.
>
>
> On Jan 10, 2008 11:46 AM, <rebeca.mmb.pcb.ub.es> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> I am trying to do replica exchange molecular dynamics using Amber9, but I
>> don´t
>> have any experience in this type of simulations.
>> I would like to compare the results I will obtain with those simulations
>> and
>> those obtained with the standar molecular dynamics, so I would like to use
>> the
>> conditions of the calculations the most similar possible between them.
>>
>> For the standar molecular dynamics I have used this input:
>>
>> &cntrl
>> imin=0, ntpr=1000, ntwx=1000, ntwe=1000, cut=12,
>> irest=1, ntx=5, gamma_ln=0.2, ntwr=30000, nstlim=30000,
>> ntb=2, ntf=2, ntc=2, ntp=1, ntt=3, temp0=300.0, dt=0.002,
>> /
>>
>> Could I use for the replica Exchange calculation an input like this one?
>> It is
>> the same, but only adding numexchg = 2:
>>
>> &cntrl
>> imin=0, ntpr=1000, ntwx=1000, ntwe=1000, cut=12,
>> irest=1, ntx=5, gamma_ln=0.2, ntwr=30000, nstlim=30000,
>> ntb=2, ntf=2, ntc=2, ntp=1, ntt=3, temp0=300.0, dt=0.002, numexchg = 2,
>> &end
>> &ewald
>> &end
>>
>> In the example of the test file, in Amber9, I could see they use another
>> options
>> in the input, like constant volume and not using boundary conditions. Is
>> there
>> any problem in doing such a calculation at constant pressure and using
>> boundary
>> conditions? And what about ntt? In the example, ntt=1, and in my case
>> ntt=3. Do
>> you know if there is any problem with that affects the results of the
>> simulation?
>>
>> I hope anyone can help!
>>
>> Best wishes,
>>
>> Rebeca García Fandiño Ph.D.
>> Molecular Modeling & Bioinformatics
>> IRBB, Parc Cientific de Barcelona
>> C/Josep Samitier 1-5
>> 08028 Barcelona
>> e-mail: regafan.usc.es
>>
>>
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> The AMBER Mail Reflector
>> To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
>> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
>>
>
--
Dr. Adrian E. Roitberg
Associate Professor
Quantum Theory Project and Department of Chemistry
University of Florida PHONE 352 392-6972
P.O. Box 118435 FAX 352 392-8722
Gainesville, FL 32611-8435 Email adrian.qtp.ufl.edu
============================================================================
To announce that there must be no criticism of the president,
or that we are to stand by the president right or wrong,
is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."
-- Theodore Roosevelt
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Sun Jan 13 2008 - 06:07:14 PST
