On Thu, Jun 14, 2007, mbrut.laas.fr wrote:
>
> > This is correct. We are working on getting second derivatives for the GB
> > energy function, but this is not yet completed. The general workaround
> > (by no means completely satisfactory) is to minimize with epsilon=4r
> > (that is, dielc=4 and eedmeth=5), then use that also for normal modes.
> > It is not well established yet how good or bad an approximation this is.
>
> isn't it possible, but with igb=0 ?
Yes it is certainly possible. I just note that the development of second
derivatives for GB is now complete (in NAB).
...dac
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Sun Jun 17 2007 - 06:07:34 PDT
