Thank you very much
On 4/25/07, Carlos Simmerling <carlos.simmerling.gmail.com> wrote:
>
> yes it is the same, only the parameters differ.
>
> On 4/24/07, Chengwen Chen <chenchengwen.gmail.com> wrote:
> > Dear Amber user,
> >
> > In Amber website, the basic additive form of amber equation for Cornell
> et
> > al. 1995 force field include just bonds, angles, dihedrals and nonbonded
> > pairs, i.e. omitting polarization as well as the hydrogen
> > bonding 10-12 term. I wonder if the equation for ff99 force field is the
> > same ? Since I want to use the equation in my thesis, so I need an
> accurate
> > answer.
> >
> > Thank you very much!
> >
> > Best Wishes,
> > Chen Chengwen
>
>
> --
> ===================================================================
> Carlos L. Simmerling, Ph.D.
> Associate Professor Phone: (631) 632-1336
> Center for Structural Biology Fax: (631) 632-1555
> CMM Bldg, Room G80
> Stony Brook University E-mail: carlos.simmerling.gmail.com
> Stony Brook, NY 11794-5115
> ===================================================================
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> The AMBER Mail Reflector
> To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Wed Apr 25 2007 - 06:07:39 PDT
