On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 07:05:41PM -0700, Mengjuei Hsieh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After consulting some of my FreeBSD friends, I am convinced that this
> kind of hugh patch file is okay for /usr/ports/bio/amber9 ...
>
> --
> Mengjuei
>
> On 5/5/06, David A. Case <case.scripps.edu> wrote:
> >Well, this is easy enough to fix for Amber 10, and I suppose we could make
> >a
> >gigantic patch file for Amber 9; but the path workaround sounds OK for now.
> >Of course, we always should have used a bit of indirection here [writing
> >"$(MAKE)" instead of "make"], but we didn't appreciate the problems that
> >arose
> >with BSD....
> >...dac
And that's probably what I'll do. It does not make much sense to
inflict this on everyone else just for esthetic reasons. If I
come up with a FBSD port, I'll send the patches to the amber
developers to do with as they please. I'll also post a url here
as the other *BSD guys may have the same issue.
Good discussion, but somewhat off the molecular mechanics critical
path :-)
Thanks all,
Bud
--
M. L. Dodson
Personal: mldodson-at-houston-dot-rr-dot-com
Work: bdodson-at-scms-dot-utmb-dot-edu
Work: four_zero_nine-772-2178 FAX: four_zero_nine-747-8608
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Sun May 07 2006 - 06:07:08 PDT
