Hi,
After consulting some of my FreeBSD friends, I am convinced that this
kind of hugh patch file is okay for /usr/ports/bio/amber9 ...
--
Mengjuei
On 5/5/06, David A. Case <case.scripps.edu> wrote:
> Well, this is easy enough to fix for Amber 10, and I suppose we could make a
> gigantic patch file for Amber 9; but the path workaround sounds OK for now.
> Of course, we always should have used a bit of indirection here [writing
> "$(MAKE)" instead of "make"], but we didn't appreciate the problems that arose
> with BSD....
> ...dac
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Sun May 07 2006 - 06:07:08 PDT