Re: AMBER: NTT for production run

From: David A. Case <>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 12:21:52 -0800

On Wed, Mar 15, 2006, Vlad Cojocaru wrote:
> After these 100 ps I switched to production runs both with ntt=1,
> tautp=5.0 and with ntt=0 ... And I definetely observed a steady decrease
> in T and Ek. That's when I decided to go further with ntt=1, tautp=5.0 ....

I have not seen such behavior, but you don't give any quantitative idea of
how large the effect is. It sounds like you are not conserving total energy;
if that is the case, it indicates a problem that you should try to track down.


David A. Case                     |  e-mail:
Dept. of Molecular Biology, TPC15 |  fax:          +1-858-784-8896
The Scripps Research Institute    |  phone:        +1-858-784-9768
10550 N. Torrey Pines Rd.         |  home page:                   
La Jolla CA 92037  USA            |
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to
Received on Sun Mar 19 2006 - 06:10:18 PST
Custom Search