Re: AMBER: questions about NMODE

From: <xhu1.memphis.edu>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 18:34:08 -0500

Dear Dr. Dac,

You are right. I used the default values for nmode, which is different
from the default values in sander. After correcting these values,
nmode works! Thank you so much!

Regards

Xiaohua

> Are you using the same dielectric model in the two calculations? If
> everything else is the same except for the electrostatics, then it
> shouldbe possible for you to track down the origin of the
differences.
>
> ...dac
>
> --
>
> ==================================================================
> David A. Case | e-mail: case.scripps.edu
> Dept. of Molecular Biology, TPC15 | fax: +1-858-784-8896
> The Scripps Research Institute | phone: +1-858-784-9768
> 10550 N. Torrey Pines Rd. | home page:
> La Jolla CA 92037 USA | http://www.scripps.edu/case
> ==================================================================
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> The AMBER Mail Reflector
> To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
>

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Fri Apr 30 2004 - 00:53:00 PDT
Custom Search