one more citation on the discussion on the "appropriateness" of the value
Chan et al, 1997, Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Str, 26, 425
Regards,
Martin Lepsik
> Dear Giulio,
> yes, SURFTEN value of 0.0072 is correct (for the time being, maybe) for
GB.
> I've just found the original citation:
>
> Still et al: JACS 1990, vol 112, pg 6127
>
> All the best,
>
> Martin Lepsik
>
>
>
> > By the way, are the **GB** parameters of SURFTEN= 0.0072 and SURFOFF = 0
> > correct?
> > Thanks for your reply
> > Giulio
>
>
Received on Fri Oct 25 2002 - 06:55:12 PDT
