Re:SURFTEN for GB

From: Lepsa <lepsik_at_marilyn.uochb.cas.cz>
Date: Fri 25 Oct 2002 15:51:30 +0200

Dear Giulio,
yes, SURFTEN value of 0.0072 is correct (for the time being, maybe) for GB.
I've just found the original citation:

Still et al: JACS 1990, vol 112, pg 6127

All the best,

    Martin Lepsik



> By the way, are the **GB** parameters of SURFTEN= 0.0072 and SURFOFF = 0
> correct?
> Thanks for your reply
> Giulio
Received on Fri Oct 25 2002 - 06:51:30 PDT
Custom Search