Tru Huynh writes:
>David Konerding wrote:
>>
>> Although I like the numbers you got, "version 2.96" from Red Hat is not
>> an acceptable compiler- please use 2.95.2, since it's an official release from
>> the GCC team.
>
>Here they are. The executables were compiled with gcc-2.95.2
>under Mandrake 7.2 and run both under Mandrake 7.2 and RedHat 7.0.
>Strangely the benchs run faster under RH7 than MDK72.
>
>
>PROWAT5:
> RH70 : 60.01 (59.00)
> MDK72: 68.15 (66.97)
>PROWAT6:
> RH70 : 118.26 (116.88)
> MDK72: 157.37 (155.73)
>DHFR:
> RH70 : 204.00 (199.58)
> MDK72: 229.86 (224.93)
>4096WAT:
> RH70 : 106.67 (105.12)
> MDK72: 120.88 (119.09)
>amber6 benchmark:
> RH70 : 204.82 (200.38)
> MDK72: 230.59 (225.63)
I can't recall if Amber-6.0 provides the same extensive breakdown of the timings,
as does the newer version of sander that I have been working with (pre-7.0).
But you could quickly figure out why the timings were different. It's
really surprising that RH7 is faster than MDK72, because Mandrake usually
uses more aggressive optimizations than Red Hat when they compile their C library.
Dave
Received on Tue Feb 20 2001 - 10:25:14 PST
