Tru Huynh writes:
>Hello,
>
>just to add to the new mailing list archive (great idea!):
>
>Off the list I was asked why my figures with the GNU compilers
>were so bad. Both the archive and by mail, the answer was to
>upgrade the compiler version to gcc >= 2.95.2.
>
>I installed Redhat7 and tried with version the gnu tools version 2.96
>( I guess I could have changed to mandrake 7.2 and try 2.95.2)
Although I like the numbers you got, "version 2.96" from Red Hat is not
an acceptable compiler- please use 2.95.2, since it's an official release from
the GCC team.
From rajaamber6_at_rediffmail.com 16 Feb 2001 17:25:25 -0000
Message-id: <20010216172525.14917.qmail.mailweb6.rediffmail.com>
Date: 16 Feb 2001 17:25:25 -0000
From: Raja Swaminathan <rajaamber6_at_rediffmail.com>
To: AMBER list <amber.heimdal.compchem.ucsf.edu>
Subject: periodic box size
In-Reply-to: <3A8D028F.7E4357E8.pasteur.fr>
hi amber users
i have done md simulations on a 14 mer DNA duplex.
the box size is
42.7539974 43.0651857 45.8525446
i have used the next line as 43 43 46
will it be there any problem in md simulations or
the system will take only more computational time.
thanks
raja
_____________________________________________________
Chat with your friends as soon as they come online. Get Rediff Bol at
http://bol.rediff.com
Received on Fri Feb 16 2001 - 08:06:38 PST
