[AMBER] Difference in cpptraj output structures between NVT equilibration and NPT production runs

From: YASHIKA . via AMBER <amber.ambermd.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 10:55:42 +0530

Respected Team,

I am facing an issue while analyzing my trajectories. After running
equilibration under NVT (pmemd.cuda), I used cpptraj to convert the final
.rst7 file to .pdb. The structure looks abnormal (screenshot attached).
However, when I performed the production run under NPT (pmemd.cuda) and
analyzed the .rst7 file with cpptraj in the same way, the output structure
looks normal (screenshot attached).

I am not sure why there is such a difference in visualization between the
equilibration and production structures. Could this be related to imaging,
wrapping, or my input parameters?

Below are my input files:

Equilibrate the system for 10ns
 &cntrl
  nstlim=5000000, dt=0.002, ntx=5, irest=1, ntpr=1500, ntwr=1500,
  ntwx=50000, ntxo=2, ioutfm=1,
  tempi=300.0, temp0=300.0, ntt=3, gamma_ln=1.0,
  ntb=1, ntp=0, ig=-1,
  cut=18,
  ntc=2, ntf=2,
  nrespa=1,
  ntr=0
/

Constant pressure constant temperature production run for 10ns
 &cntrl
  nstlim=5000000, dt=0.002, ntx=5, irest=1, ntpr=1000, ntwr=1000,
  ntwx=25000, gamma_ln=1.0,
  temp0=300.0, ntt=3, tautp=2.0,
  ntb=2, ntp=1,
  cut=18,
  ntc=2, ntf=2,
  nrespa=1,
&end

Both equilibration and production were run using *pmemd.cuda.*

Could anyone please explain why the structures appear so different between
equilibration and production? Is this expected behavior due to
imaging/periodic boundary conditions, or am I missing something? If anyone
has encountered this before, I would really appreciate your advice.

Thank you in advance for your help.

With regards,

Yashika


_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber

production.jpeg
(image/jpeg attachment: production.jpeg)

equilibration.jpeg
(image/jpeg attachment: equilibration.jpeg)

Received on Wed Sep 03 2025 - 23:00:03 PDT
Custom Search