Re: [AMBER] MCPB, negative force constant?

From: Pengfei Li via AMBER <amber.ambermd.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 16:39:19 -0600

Hi Matthew,

I think it is because the Seminario method has issue to handle such a case. You can try to use the empirical method (option -2e) to derive the force constant parameters instead.

Pengfei

> On Nov 30, 2023, at 12:10 PM, Matthew Guberman-Pfeffer <mgubermanpfeffer.icloud.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Pengfei,
>
> I want to follow up to see if you have been able to look at the negative force constant issue further and if you have suggestions I can try. Please let me know.
>
> Best,
> Matthew
>
>
>> On Nov 21, 2023, at 8:13 AM, Matthew Guberman-Pfeffer <mgubermanpfeffer.icloud.com> wrote:
>>
>> o
>

_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Tue Dec 05 2023 - 15:00:02 PST
Custom Search