Re: [AMBER] Missing atom types in parmchk.dat

From: David A Case via AMBER <amber.ambermd.org>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 13:06:36 -0400

On Tue, May 23, 2023, Robert Heße via AMBER wrote:
>Am 2023-05-22 18:18, schrieb Rodrigo Galindo-Murillo:

>>As far as I can see, you do not need an frcmod file, I ran your
>>molecule through tleap and it generated the topology and coordinates
>>just fine.
>
>thank you for the fast response. As far as i know it should be an
>already defined residue as i am saving it directly from the OL15 force
>field via tleap. For the future i wanted to incoperate modified
>nucleobases based on the DG of OL15, which i most likely have to
>parametrize. As such i wanted to compare them with an already
>established residue but i fear that the parametrization might not be
>possible without defining the missing atom types somehow.

I would still wait to see what parameters are missing in your modified
bases. If something is missing (without running parmchk), you may be able
to hand-create a frcmod file based on analogies to what is in gaff2.dat.

....dac


_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Tue May 23 2023 - 10:30:02 PDT
Custom Search