[AMBER] Why uinsg a cutoff or 8.0 for proteins and 10.0 for proteins embeded in a membrane?

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Téletchéa Stéphane via AMBER <amber.ambermd.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 18:29:16 +0200

_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Mon Apr 17 2023 - 09:30:02 PDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Téletchéa Stéphane via AMBER: "Re: [AMBER] Why uinsg a cutoff or 8.0 for proteins and 10.0 for proteins embeded in a membrane?"
Previous message: Alexej Jerschow via AMBER: "[AMBER] Widom insertion method, calculate chemical potential"
Next in thread: Téletchéa Stéphane via AMBER: "Re: [AMBER] Why uinsg a cutoff or 8.0 for proteins and 10.0 for proteins embeded in a membrane?"
Reply: Téletchéa Stéphane via AMBER: "Re: [AMBER] Why uinsg a cutoff or 8.0 for proteins and 10.0 for proteins embeded in a membrane?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

Custom Search