Make sure the inpcrd and prmtop files are the same between the two
approaches. So far even bond and angle terms are different!
Ray
--
Ray Luo, Ph.D.
Professor of Structural Biology/Biochemistry/Biophysics,
Chemical and Materials Physics, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering,
Biomedical Engineering, and Materials Science and Engineering
Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry
University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3900
On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 8:21 AM Alan <alanwilter.gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Prof. Case, please see the details below.
>
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 at 14:26, David A Case <david.case.rutgers.edu> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 13, 2022, Alan wrote:
> > >
> > >After reviewing Amber21 manual I updated to:
> > >cat << EOF >| mdin
> > >Single point
> > >&cntrl
> > >imin=0, maxcyc=0,
> > >ntmin=2,
> > >igb=6,
> > >//
> > >EOF
> >
> > Above looks suspicious: the default value for ntb is 1, and you don't
> reset
> > it to 0. Study the mdout file to see if there is any evidence that you
> are
> > actually using PME.
> >
>
> I looked at the Amber21 manual.
> From 21.7.1. Generic parameters:
> It states igb > 0 implies ntb = 0 and cut = 9999.0
>
> from mdout:
> ntf = 1, ntb = 0, igb = 6, nsnb = 25
> dielc = 1.00000, cut =9999.00000, intdiel = 1.00000
>
> and no, not using PME.
>
> Using my old mdin (ntb=0, igb=0, cut=999) give the same result as the new
> one (igb=6).
> Also, when I compare with Gromacs I got the error inferior to 0.001% and
> I'm sure it's not using PME neither PBC.
>
>
> > >print(f"{inp.igb}, {inp.cut}, {inp.ntb}, {e.tot}, {e.elec}")
> >
> > As a check, compare the bond, angle and dihedral angles as well.
> >
>
> In details:
> Python x Sander
> error angle : 0.48950 % 4.29874 x 4.27770
> error bond : 2.04820 % 0.75717 x 0.77300
> error dihedral: 0.01374 % 14.90205 x 14.90410
> error vdw_14 : 0.04436 % 9.22471 x 9.22880
> error vdw : 0.33978 % 3.83343 x 3.84650
> error elec_14 : 0.00867 % 231.30996 x 231.28990
> error elec : 0.01118 % -263.32243 x -263.29300
> error tot : 2.27586 % 1.00363 x 1.02700
>
> I'm still puzzle.
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Thu Jan 13 2022 - 09:30:02 PST