[AMBER] RNA chiOL3 tleap and ACPYPE conversion

From: Mandar Kulkarni <mandar.kulkarni.chem.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2021 13:47:50 +0200

Hello Everyone,

I am using AMBERTOOLS21 and GROMACS2019.6. I understand this is not exactly
an AMBERTOOLS issue, but I am trying to understand the difference in
energies as shown below.

I am comparing single point MM energies for UUCG tetraloop structure from
two different approaches: chiOL3 FF for Gromacs(
https://fch.upol.cz/ff_ol/gromacs.php) and tleap+chiOL3+ACPYPE method.
tleap + ACPYPE commands are shown below:

cat > tleap.in <<EOF
source leaprc.RNA.OL3
rna = loadpdb uucg_cano.pdb
check rna
saveamberparm rna rna.prmtop rna.inpcrd
quit
EOF

tleap -s -f tleap.in

acpype.py -x rna.inpcrd -p rna.prmtop

I observed the differences in energy terms for the same structure.

chiOL3 GROMACS FF:
Bond str angles dihedral LJ-14 coulomb-14 LJ
 coulomb total
 783.149536 360.543457 737.361735 345.390991 -4339.620605 -59.470943
1003.757202

tleap+ACPYPE:
Bond str angles dihedral LJ-14 coulomb-14 LJ
 coulomb total
  83.940788 1247.141724 750.041122 516.577026 -4350.560547 292.629639
1183.106689

I look forward to your suggestions, thanks in advance.

Best Regards,
Mandar Kulkarni
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed Jul 07 2021 - 05:00:02 PDT
Custom Search