Re: [AMBER] 2.5 fs integration time step
This message
: [
Message body
] [ More options (
top
,
bottom
) ]
Related messages
: [
Next message
] [
Previous message
] [
In reply to
]
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
From
: Carlos Simmerling <
carlos.simmerling.gmail.com
>
Date
: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 09:02:59 -0400
if you use hydrogen mass repartitioning (in parmed) then you should be able
to use a 4fs time step, we do this for most of our simulations.
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ct5010406
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 8:49 AM <h_sahakyan.mb.sci.am> wrote:
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> Some researchers use the 2.5 fs integration time step, an example
> is this work How Fast-Folding Proteins Fold | Science (
>
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/334/6055/517/tab-article-info
). Do
> you have any ideas on how 2.5 fs can affect MD simulations?
>
> All the best,
> Harutyun Sahakyan
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
>
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on
Mon Apr 19 2021 - 06:30:03 PDT
This message
: [
Message body
]
Next message
:
David A Case: "Re: [AMBER] unusually high entropy values MMPBSA quasi-harmonic"
Previous message
:
h_sahakyan.mb.sci.am: "[AMBER] 2.5 fs integration time step"
In reply to
:
h_sahakyan.mb.sci.am: "[AMBER] 2.5 fs integration time step"
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
Custom Search