Hi
try using igb=5
On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 at 00:14, Ayesha Fatima <ayeshafatima.69.gmail.com>
wrote:
> Dear Dr. Elvis,
> I tried your suggestion of creating receptor and ligand prmtops from the
> complex_gas.prmtop using the ante-MMPBSA.py as well as doing new
> topologies.
> For the use of ante-MMPBSA.py, files are created but when I run the
> MMPBSA.py, the error comes
>
> ................................................................
> File "/mnt/d/amber18//bin/MMPBSA.py", line 98, in <module>
> app.loadcheck_prmtops()
> File "/mnt/d/amber18/lib/python2.7/site-packages/MMPBSA_mods/main.py",
> line 611, in loadcheck_prmtops
> self.normal_system.CheckConsistency()
> File
> "/mnt/d/amber18/lib/python2.7/site-packages/MMPBSA_mods/parm_setup.py",
> line 905, in CheckConsistency
> raise PrmtopError('Topology files have inconsistent RADIUS_SETs')
> PrmtopError: Topology files have inconsistent RADIUS_SETs
> ....................................
> I am using --radii=mbondi3 when I used the ante-MMPBSA and earlier had used
> the set default PBRadii mbondi3 when creating topologies in tleap as I am
> using igb=8 in the MMPBSA.py input file.
> In case I dont use the --radii command in the ante-MMPBSA, the error is s
> follows
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Loading and checking parameter files for compatibility...
> mmpbsa_py_energy found! Using /mnt/d/amber18/bin/mmpbsa_py_energy
> cpptraj found! Using /mnt/d/amber18/bin/cpptraj
> mmpbsa_py_nabnmode found! Using /mnt/d/amber18/bin/mmpbsa_py_nabnmode
> Preparing trajectories for simulation...
> 1000 frames were processed by cpptraj for use in calculation.
> 4 frames were processed by cpptraj for nmode calculations.
>
> Running calculations on normal system...
>
> Beginning GB calculations with /mnt/d/amber18/bin/mmpbsa_py_energy
> calculating complex contribution...
> Atom 19 outside the allowed range of 1-2 Angstroms for igb==7.
> ... regenerate prmtop with 'bondi' radii! File
> "/mnt/d/amber18//bin/MMPBSA.py", line 100, in <module>
> app.run_mmpbsa()
> File "/mnt/d/amber18/lib/python2.7/site-packages/MMPBSA_mods/main.py",
> line 218, in run_mmpbsa
> self.calc_list.run(rank, self.stdout)
> File
> "/mnt/d/amber18/lib/python2.7/site-packages/MMPBSA_mods/calculation.py",
> line 82, in run
> calc.run(rank, stdout=stdout, stderr=stderr)
> File
> "/mnt/d/amber18/lib/python2.7/site-packages/MMPBSA_mods/calculation.py",
> line 157, in run
> self.prmtop))
> CalcError: /mnt/d/amber18/bin/mmpbsa_py_energy failed with prmtop
> complex_gas.prmtop
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> In case I create new topologies, error comes for the difference in atom
> numbers.
>
> Is there any other way to solve the matter?
>
> Thank you
> Regards
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 7:02 PM Elvis A F Martis <martiseaf.elvismartis.in
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> > The total number of atoms in receptor.prmtop and hpr.prmtop do not add up
> > to the number of atoms in complex_gas.prmtop. the difference is just 1.
> > You can either build the gas topologies again or use ante-MMPBSA.py on
> the
> > complex_gas.prmtop to save receptor and ligand topologies
> >
> > On Sun, 28 Feb 2021 at 15:26, Ayesha Fatima <ayeshafatima.69.gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Dear Dr. Elvis,
> > > Files are attached hpr is the ligand. I can see that the number of
> water
> > > molecules differs even from the pdb file I created when i solvated the
> > > complex. Not sure what happened along the way. should I continue to
> make
> > a
> > > new trajectory for calculating the mmgbsa?
> > > Thank you
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > complex_gas.prmtop
> > > <
> > >
> >
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qlD6bLMFhOKTddlswJcyJoqfv-A7Z5VV/view?usp=drive_web
> > > >
> > > complex_solv.prmtop
> > > <
> > >
> >
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1HU6122WVEBGxCPQa7QNcAU0wKI3QVXf3/view?usp=drive_web
> > > >
> > > frame1-3.pdb
> > > <
> > >
> >
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1j8VejBB-47JjTAnbtHX3XnmFNm8YE8Sq/view?usp=drive_web
> > > >
> > > hpr.prmtop
> > > <
> > >
> >
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/11gpiLGEo_zkdgwtQI1AfgJMJlQe5QjsR/view?usp=drive_web
> > > >
> > > receptor_gas.prmtop
> > > <
> > >
> >
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fbjCA-NEv4WpEIYZ_kU7Q2uV6_9wZR8f/view?usp=drive_web
> > > >
> > > lvis,
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 3:07 PM Elvis A F Martis <
> > martiseaf.elvismartis.in
> > > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Can you send me all the prmtop files and 1-3 frames from the
> trajectory
> > > off
> > > > the list?
> > > >
> > > > On Sunday, 28 February 2021, Ayesha Fatima <
> ayeshafatima.69.gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Dear Dr. Elvis,
> > > > > Sorry for the late reply. Yes after stripping water, the trajectory
> > is
> > > > > accepted by the cpptraj and I can get the rmsd plot. however cannot
> > get
> > > > the
> > > > > histogram to appear. will check again. but MMPBSA is still not
> > > happening.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you
> > > > > Regards
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, 27 Feb 2021, 7:26 pm Elvis A F Martis, <
> > > martiseaf.elvismartis.in
> > > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > After stripping water from the trajectories, are you able to
> > > > > > able load the trajectory using the dry complex.prmtop in cpptraj?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Saturday, 27 February 2021, Ayesha Fatima <
> > > > ayeshafatima.69.gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Dear Dr. Elvis,
> > > > > > > Thank you for your response.
> > > > > > > I am passing all topologies as indicated in the manual
> > > > > > > 1 solvated is the same used for the simulation
> > > > > > > 3 unsolvated 1 each for complex, receptor and ligand
> > > > > > > Thank you
> > > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sat, 27 Feb 2021, 5:47 pm Elvis A F Martis, <
> > > > > martiseaf.elvismartis.in
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > if you are directly passing the solvated trajectory to
> > MMPBSA.py,
> > > > > don't
> > > > > > > > forget to use -sp <solvated_trajectory>.prmtop
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Saturday, 27 February 2021, Ayesha Fatima <
> > > > > > ayeshafatima.69.gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Dear all,
> > > > > > > > > I have a query regarding the above subject.
> > > > > > > > > I prepared my solvated and unsolvated complex and other
> > > required
> > > > > > files
> > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > simulation. the simulation ran fine. Now when i want to
> > > calculate
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > mmpbsa, the error comes for the difference in number of
> atoms
> > > > > between
> > > > > > > > > topology and trajectory files. my simulation generated the
> > .nc
> > > > > > > trajectory
> > > > > > > > > and used the MMPBSA.py script for calculation. I have
> started
> > > the
> > > > > > > > > simulation again but it will take some time now.
> > > > > > > > > Is there a workaround?
> > > > > > > > > Thank you
> > > > > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > AMBER mailing list
> > > > > > > > > AMBER.ambermd.org
> > > > > > > > > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > AMBER mailing list
> > > > > > > > AMBER.ambermd.org
> > > > > > > > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > AMBER mailing list
> > > > > > > AMBER.ambermd.org
> > > > > > > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Best Regards
> > > > > > Elvis
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > AMBER mailing list
> > > > > > AMBER.ambermd.org
> > > > > > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
> > > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > AMBER mailing list
> > > > > AMBER.ambermd.org
> > > > > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best Regards
> > > > Elvis
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > AMBER mailing list
> > > > AMBER.ambermd.org
> > > > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > AMBER mailing list
> > > AMBER.ambermd.org
> > > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards
> > Elvis
> > _______________________________________________
> > AMBER mailing list
> > AMBER.ambermd.org
> > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
> >
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
--
Best Regards
Elvis
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Sun Feb 28 2021 - 22:30:02 PST
