Re: [AMBER] Question about force field for proteins

From: Asaf Farhi <asaf.farhi.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2020 14:49:32 -0400

Dear Prof. Simmerling,

Thanks again for your help.
I will be happy to hear your recommendation about the best way to use
ff14SB in Gromacs.
There is the link with a few options
http://www.gromacs.org/Downloads/User_contributions/Force_fields

In addition, I wanted to ask if there is a force field for the terminal
residues e.g., ACE and CT2.

Thank you for your help,
Best regards,
Asaf



On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 11:37 AM Carlos Simmerling <
carlos.simmerling.gmail.com> wrote:

> see my comments inserted below
>
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 11:31 AM Asaf Farhi <asaf.farhi.gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Dear all,
> >
> > My name is Asaf and I'm a postdoc at Creol, UCF.
> >
> > I would be happy to consult with you regarding the choice of force field
> > for proteins.
> > I have read in the manual that the recommended force field for proteins
> is
> > ff14SB.
> >
> > I have a few questions and I would really appreciate your help:
> > 1. What does SB stand for?
> >
>
> SB stands for Stony Brook, my home institution. All of the protein models
> from my lab are indicated with the "SB"
>
>
> > 2. Can the CMAP parameters be changed (manually) in free energy
> > calculations with Gromacs?
> >
>
> I don't know how Gromacs handles CMAPs, it may be better to ask Gromacs
> developers. Note that ff14SB does not include CMAPs, so this may not
> matter. ff19SB includes CMAPs, and ot my knowledge this is not yet
> implemented in Gromacs since we use different CMAPs for different amino
> acids.
>
>
> > 3. What is the recommended force field without CMAP?
> >
>
> ff14SB does not use CMAPs
>
>
> > 4. Are Amber99 or Amber99sb*-ILDN recommended?
> >
>
> Amber99 (really should be called ff99) is not recommended, it is very old
> and should no longer be used.
> ff99SB*-ILDN is more recent, but my recommendation would be to use ff14SB
> instead. Of course others may have good experience with ff99SB*-ILDN as
> well. It included some backbone and sidechain updates to our ff99SB model,
> but ff14SB has a more extensive refitting of side chain parameters (in
> addition to a small backbone adjustment).
>
>
> > Thank you for your help,
> > Best regards,
> > Asaf
> > _______________________________________________
> > AMBER mailing list
> > AMBER.ambermd.org
> > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
> >
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Sat Oct 10 2020 - 12:00:02 PDT
Custom Search