I'm currently without network access to the code, but this looks like a
misprint in both cases. Someone, like me, could do a 'grep " 18 " src/*/*'
command to see all instances of that 18. But please be assured, you've got
Amber20.
Dave
On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 10:19 PM Baker, Joseph <bakerj.tcnj.edu> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In my output log files when running pmemd.cuda in Amber20 I get the
> following (Amber 20 PMEMD but then a comment about release 18). pmemd
> --version says Version 20 in this case.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------- Amber 20 PMEMD 2020
> -------------------------------------------------------| PMEMD
> implementation of SANDER, Release 18
>
> But this made me curious, and I've noticed too that when looking at some of
> my Amber18 output logs in the output it reports Amber 18 and Release 18,
> but doing pmemd --version with Amber18 loaded reports Version 16.
>
> Are these just misprints in the output header info (for version 20) and in
> the version info for Amber18?
>
> Thanks!
> Joe
>
> ------
> Joseph Baker, PhD
> Associate Professor
> Department of Chemistry
> C212 Science Complex
> The College of New Jersey
> Ewing, NJ 08628
> Phone: (609) 771-3173
> Web: http://bakerj.pages.tcnj.edu/
> Pronouns: he/him/his
>
> Chair (2020), Trenton Local Section of the ACS
> Chemistry Division Councilor (2018-2021), The Council on Undergraduate
> Research
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Sat May 30 2020 - 21:00:01 PDT
