Hi Everyone,
I tried my hands on RTX 2080 Super today. I used AMBER 16. I got 17
ns/day for a system of 172K atoms.
This was quite disappointing as i get 36 ns/day from my 1080 ti cards
using AMBER 18 using the same 172K atoms system.
I don't know if it is the variation in the GPU cards or the one lower
AMBER version responsible.
Both machines were built by Exxact corporation.
I hope some developers can weigh in on this.
Regards
Abhilash
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 8:05 AM Pietro Amodeo <pamodeo.icb.cnr.it> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since NVidia RTX 3XXX cards are not expected before Q4 2020, and rumored
> RTX 2080 Super Ti models have not been confirmed, RTX 2080 Super,
> costing between 3/5 and 2/3 of Ti, could represent a good interim
> solution, especially because both all-in-one and integrated-block
> water-cooled cards based on this chip exist (a potentially critical
> issue for such a clock-boosted solution).
>
> In this view, info about RTX 2080 Super performances with AMBER 18 (and,
> possibly, 20) would allow a proper cost/benefit ratio comparison between
> Super and Ti versions.
>
> Thank you in advance for any info.
>
> Best,
>
> Pietro
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Thu Feb 27 2020 - 08:30:01 PST
