Re: [AMBER] Generalized Born and entropy
This message
: [
Message body
] [ More options (
top
,
bottom
) ]
Related messages
: [
Next message
] [
Previous message
] [
Maybe in reply to
] [
Next in thread
] [
Replies
]
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
From
: Rosellen, Martin <
martin.rosellen.16.ucl.ac.uk
>
Date
: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 12:48:19 +0000
Hi David,
thanks for the clarification.
In the Amber tutorial on MMGBSA
http://ambermd.org/tutorials/advanced/tutorial3/
there is an empirical term for hydrophobic contributions mentioned. As I understand you this does not related to entropy at all?
best
Martin
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on
Mon Jan 13 2020 - 05:00:02 PST
This message
: [
Message body
]
Next message
:
Carlos Simmerling: "Re: [AMBER] Generalized Born and entropy"
Previous message
:
Carlos Simmerling: "Re: [AMBER] Tracking ligand position throughout equilibration stages"
Maybe in reply to
:
Martin Rosellen: "[AMBER] Generalized Born and entropy"
Next in thread
:
Carlos Simmerling: "Re: [AMBER] Generalized Born and entropy"
Reply
:
Carlos Simmerling: "Re: [AMBER] Generalized Born and entropy"
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
Custom Search