Dear Geng,
Looks like there is a mismatch between the prmtop file and the
water-free trajectory files for the molecule termed "PL". You can
visualize these files with VMD to confirm this.
All the best,
Ray
--
Ray Luo, Ph.D.
Professor of Structural Biology/Biochemistry/Biophysics,
Chemical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, and Chemical Engineering
Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry
University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3900
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 12:23 AM 东庚 <gdong.stu.edu.cn> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I have been trying to run MMPBSA.py on AMBER18 using one core and I am confused with two problems showed below.
> The first question is about the GBSA. GB calculation failed with PL.prmtop (protein with ligand). The calcerror showed the cpptraj failed with prmtop PL.prmtop, which was quite similar to a problem showed by Jag I saw on your website http://archive.ambermd.org/201602/0177.html. I checked the output file(_MMPBSA_complex_gb.mdout.0) and it printed MM/GBSA processing done! It stopped on this step and I found the value of esurf is zero indicating the surface area was failing in cpptraj as you had said on the amber mailing. In the end I still cannot find what reason caused this problem and how to solve it.
>
> Information in detail:
> Loading and checking parameter files for compatibility...
> mmpbsa_py_energy found! Using /home/Geng/Program/amber18/bin/mmpbsa_py_energy
> cpptraj found! Using /home/Geng/Program/amber18/bin/cpptraj
> Preparing trajectories for simulation...
> 50 frames were processed by cpptraj for use in calculation.
>
> Running calculations on normal system...
>
> Beginning GB calculations with /home/Geng/Program/amber18/bin/mmpbsa_py_energy
> calculating complex contribution...
> File "/home/Geng/Program/amber18/bin/MMPBSA.py", line 100, in <module>
> app.run_mmpbsa()
> File "/home/Geng/Program/amber18/lib/python2.7/site-packages/MMPBSA_mods/main.py", line 218, in run_mmpbsa
> self.calc_list.run(rank, self.stdout)
> File "/home/Geng/Program/amber18/lib/python2.7/site-packages/MMPBSA_mods/calculation.py", line 82, in run
> calc.run(rank, stdout=stdout, stderr=stderr)
> File "/home/Geng/Program/amber18/lib/python2.7/site-packages/MMPBSA_mods/calculation.py", line 478, in run
> self.prmtop))
> CalcError: /home/Geng/Program/amber18/bin/cpptraj failed with prmtop PL.prmtop!
> Exiting. All files have been retained.
>
>
> The second question is about the PB. According to the description of Jag, I also calculated PB alone and it succeeded as well while the result (MMPBSA.dat) was quite weird comparing to a normal one. The energy difference of BOND was quite large and the result of ANGLE was nan.
>
> WARNING: INCONSISTENCIES EXIST WITHIN INTERNAL POTENTIAL
> TERMS. THE VALIDITY OF THESE RESULTS ARE HIGHLY QUESTIONABLE
> Complex:
> Energy Component Average Std. Dev. Std. Err. of Mean
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> BOND 6989927.5966 4302005.2073 192391.5217
> ANGLE nan nan nan
> DIHED 4734.9672 24.0139 1.0739
> VDWAALS -3074.5516 25.0129 1.1186
> EEL -24965.3966 115.5749 5.1687
> 1-4 VDW 1354.1557 15.1246 0.6764
> 1-4 EEL 14320.6802 50.0816 2.2397
> EPB -4946.9619 93.1503 4.1658
> ENPOLAR 92.3966 1.0545 0.0472
>
> G gas nan nan nan
> G solv -4854.5653 92.6190 4.1420
>
> TOTAL nan nan nan
>
>
> Could you give me some suggestions?
>
> I would be very grateful for your help.
>
> Geng
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed Nov 06 2019 - 09:30:02 PST