[AMBER] Significant deviation in electrostatics, (EEL/EGL values)

From: Aswin Hanagal <aswinhanagal.yandex.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 20:41:56 +0530

   I'm not able to reproduce the results given in this link
   http://ambermd.org/tutorials/advanced/tutorial3/py_script/section2.htmwhen
   using Amber19 Pmemd (CUDA) to run the simulations. Particularly my EEL/EPB
   values are significantly different even though my delta Gtotal values are
   similar to what is expected. I have changed the input files quite a few
   times to try and get a closer result but regardless i'm getting deviated
   values in both the PB and GB electrostatics. Is this to be expected? Below
   is my mmpbsa output file for PB only as this is where he EEL/EPB deviations
   are more apparent.
   Â
   | Run on Wed Jul  3 11:47:48 2019
   |
   |Input file:
   |--------------------------------------------------------------
   |Input file for running PB and GB in serial
   |&general
   | Â startframe=300,endframe=500,interval=10,keep_files=2,
   |/
   |&pb
   | Â istrng=0.100, inp=1, radiopt=0, fillratio=4.0, cavity_surften=0.0072,
   cavity_offset=0.86
   |/
   |--------------------------------------------------------------
   |MMPBSA.py Version=14.0
   |Solvated complex topology file: Â SOLV.prmtop
   |Complex topology file: Â Â Â Â Â complex-ante.prmtop
   |Receptor topology file: Â Â Â Â Â receptor-ante.prmtop
   |Ligand topology file: Â Â Â Â Â Â ligand-ante.prmtop
   |Initial mdcrd(s): Â Â Â Â Â Â Â
   Â ../Production_Simulation/MD_1.mdcrd
   |
   |Receptor mask: Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ":1-242"
   |Ligand mask: Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ":243"
   |Ligand residue name is "LIG"
   |
   |Calculations performed using 21 complex frames.
   |Poisson Boltzmann calculations performed using internal PBSA solver in
   mmpbsa_py_energy
   |
   |All units are reported in kcal/mole.
   ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   ---
   ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   ---
   Â
   POISSON BOLTZMANN:
   Â
   Complex:
   Energy Component       Average        Std. Dev. Â
   Std. Err. of Mean
   ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   ---
   VDWAALS Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â -2008.9413 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 21.5994 Â
   Â Â Â Â Â Â 4.7134
   EEL Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â -16893.8777 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 54.0189
   Â Â Â Â Â Â 11.7879
   EPB Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â -2939.6031 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 42.5845
   Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 9.2927
   ENPOLAR Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 93.6548 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 1.1848
   Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.2585
   Â
   G gas          -18902.8190        49.1428 Â
   Â Â Â Â Â 10.7238
   G solv          -2845.9484        42.6445 Â
   Â Â Â Â Â Â 9.3058
   Â
   TOTAL Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â -21748.7674 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 55.0018 Â
   Â Â Â Â Â 12.0024
   Â
   Receptor:
   Energy Component       Average        Std. Dev. Â
   Std. Err. of Mean
   ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   ---
   VDWAALS Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â -1947.4382 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 21.0682 Â
   Â Â Â Â Â Â 4.5975
   EEL Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â -16750.5690 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 57.9642
   Â Â Â Â Â Â 12.6488
   EPB Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â -3079.3301 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 51.3910
   Â Â Â Â Â Â 11.2144
   ENPOLAR Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 95.9442 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 1.1311
   Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.2468
   Â
   G gas          -18698.0072        51.5286 Â
   Â Â Â Â Â 11.2445
   G solv          -2983.3859        51.7566 Â
   Â Â Â Â Â 11.2942
   Â
   TOTAL Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â -21681.3930 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 51.1759 Â
   Â Â Â Â Â 11.1675
   Â
   Ligand:
   Energy Component       Average        Std. Dev. Â
   Std. Err. of Mean
   ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   ---
   VDWAALS Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â -4.7575 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 1.3592
   Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.2966
   EEL Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 48.2262 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â
   Â 3.3345 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.7276
   EPB Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â -79.0733 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â
   Â 1.1124 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.2428
   ENPOLAR Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 6.5719 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.0418
   Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.0091
   Â
   G gas            43.4687         3.6361
   Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.7935
   G solv           -72.5014         1.1072
   Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.2416
   Â
   TOTAL Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â -29.0327 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 2.8527
   Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.6225
   Â
   Differences (Complex - Receptor - Ligand):
   Energy Component       Average        Std. Dev. Â
   Std. Err. of Mean
   ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   ---
   VDWAALS Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â -56.7456 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 2.7554
   Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.6013
   EEL Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â -191.5350 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 23.9159
   Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 5.2189
   EPB Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 218.8003 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 19.7621
   Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 4.3124
   ENPOLAR Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â -8.8614 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.3138
   Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.0685
   EDISPER Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.0000 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.0000
   Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 0.0000
   Â
   DELTA G gas        -248.2805        25.2482 Â
   Â Â Â Â Â Â 5.5096
   DELTA G solv        209.9389        19.8835 Â
   Â Â Â Â Â Â 4.3389
   Â
   DELTA TOTAL Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â -38.3416 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 7.2458 Â
   Â Â Â Â Â Â 1.5812
   Â
   ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   ---
   ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   ---
   Â
   Thanking you in advance,
   Â
   Aswin Hanagal
   Â
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed Jul 10 2019 - 08:30:02 PDT
Custom Search