Hi All, 
    I am trying to recompute the energies using PMEMD for individual frames from a trajectory generated from a previous PMEMD simulation (under NVT ensemble). However, I get very different VDWAALS and EELEC energies between the recomputed ones and the ones printed in original simulation. Does anyone know how this big difference comes from? It seems different pairlist shouldn't produce such a large different values.
  In order to show this problem, I made a simple test using the following scripts (see below). From the comparison, the bonded terms are very close to each other. However, the nonbonded terms (VDWAALS and EELEC) are very different from the original simulation and recomputed simulation.
  Is there a way that I can get the same recomputed energies as the ones printed from the original simulation with PMEMD? Any suggestion or explanation is greatly appreciated.
Big thanks!
Mingjun
------------------trajectory generation: 4 frames were recorded from this simulation
test md simulations
&cntrl
! parameters for general MD
imin = 0, nstlim = 200, irest = 0, dt = 0.002,
ntt = 3, temp0 = 298.0, gamma_ln = 2.0, ig = -1,
ntb = 1, mcbarint = 1,
ntp = 0, barostat = 2, pres0 = 1.01325, taup = 2.0,
ntwe = 10, ntwx = 50, ntpr = 1, ntwr = 10, ntave = 10,
ioutfm = 1, iwrap = 1, ntxo = 2,
ntc = 2, ntf = 1,
 
/
&ewald
/
----------------------The energy components for the 3rd recorded frame:
NSTEP =      151   TIME(PS) =       0.302  TEMP(K) =   230.95  PRESS =     0.0 
Etot   =   -144574.8836  EKtot   =     24867.1203  EPtot      =   -169442.0039 
BOND   =       907.5497  ANGLE   =      2519.4685  DIHED      =      4651.2401 
1-4 NB =      1345.9908  1-4 EEL =     16351.0887  VDWAALS    =     21141.9669 
EELEC  =   -216359.3087  EHBOND  =         0.0000  RESTRAINT  =         0.0000 
Ewald error estimate:   0.3404E-04
=====================PMEMD rerun with the 3rd frame generated from above simulation
rerun md simulations
&cntrl 
! parameters for general MD 
imin = 0, nstlim = 2, irest = 0, dt = 0.002, 
ntt = 3, temp0 = 298.0, gamma_ln = 2.0, ig = -1, 
ntb = 1, mcbarint = 1, 
ntp = 0, barostat = 2, pres0 = 1.01325, taup = 2.0, 
ntwe = 10, ntwx = 50, ntpr = 1, ntwr = 10, ntave = 10, 
ioutfm = 1, iwrap = 1, ntxo = 2, 
ntc = 2, ntf = 1, 
 
/ 
&ewald 
/
----------------------The energy components for step 0 with the 3rd recorded frame:
NSTEP =        0   TIME(PS) =       0.000  TEMP(K) =     0.00  PRESS =     0.0
Etot   =   -158202.8866  EKtot   =         0.0000  EPtot      =   -158202.8866
BOND   =       907.5465  ANGLE   =      2519.4674  DIHED      =      4651.2408
1-4 NB =      1345.9908  1-4 EEL =     16351.0884  VDWAALS    =     20307.6375
EELEC  =   -204285.8579  EHBOND  =         0.0000  RESTRAINT  =         0.0000
Ewald error estimate:   0.4939E-04
----------------------
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Fri May 24 2019 - 03:30:02 PDT