Re: [AMBER] Protein_plus_ADP_plus_Mg2+_preparation_general_rule

From: Christina Bergonzo <cbergonzo.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 10:01:52 -0500

Hello,

Without knowing specifics about your system, I would guess that ignoring
the contribution of Mg2+ to chelating ADP would be bad in general, and also
not representative of the system you want to simulate.
Mg2+ is parameterized in Amber, you can check the Amber manual, page 51 to
read more about the ion parameters available.

Good luck!
-Christina

On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 1:57 PM Antonio Amber Carlesso <
antonio.amber.carlesso.gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> We are interested in performing a MD simulations of a protein where on its
> kinase active is co-crystallized ADP and Mg2+
>
>
>
> Is there any general rule when we would like to simulate a system with a
> divalent cation (in this case Mg2+) in its pocket site?
>
>
> A simplistic approach could be remove the ion before simulations.
>
> When this "simplistic approach" could be considered a bias in the analysis?
>
> Any considerations/reflections about it?
>
>
>
> Thank you!
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>


-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Christina Bergonzo
Research Chemist
Biomolecular Measurement Division, MML, NIST
-----------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Thu Feb 21 2019 - 07:30:02 PST
Custom Search