On Sun, Feb 03, 2019, GiovanniMaria Piccini wrote:
>However, I really need the total potential energy like to one that I get
>from the Orca PM3 output and not the heats of formations.
Why? The difference is just a constant (for any given system). In what
way does a change in the zero of energy change your analysis?
>1) If one uses imin=5 reading an external trajectory with plumed=1 and a
>plumed file, AMBER recognizes the presence of plumed and say it will use
>it.
>however, plumed is not called during the AMBER run with the external
>trajectory and , thus, I had to grep the information I needed from the
>AMBER output.
This sounds like something we should look into. I'm guessing relatively
few people actually use plumed with Amber (especially with imin=5), so I
don't recall having seen this behavior reported before.
>
>2) If AMBER prints only the heats of formation than there is a problem with
>the plumed2 patch as plumed intends to read the potential energy and
>instead it read the heats of formation.
>From the plumed side we can modify the patch ubt we nedd to have access to
>the potential energy from AMBER.
Same question as above here.
....dac
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Sun Feb 03 2019 - 17:30:02 PST
