Dear Ross,
thanks for your answer!
All the best,
Nick
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2018 16:12:54 -0400
> From: Ross Walker <ross.rosswalker.co.uk>
> Subject: Re: [AMBER] CUDA 10.0 vs CUDA 9.2 for Amber18&1080Ti GTX -
> any gain in performance?
> To: AMBER Mailing List <amber.ambermd.org>
> Message-ID: <A9049A43-5A4C-4070-B023-930696FEE8CB.rosswalker.co.uk>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Hi Nick,
>
> CUDA 10.0 is not yet supported. There will need to be modifications to the
> AMBER source code to support it.
>
> As such there is no comparison available yet between CUDA 10.0 and 9.2. If
> history serves as a guide though you can generally expect to see about a 5%
> decrease (yes decrease) in performance when going to a newer CUDA compiler.
>
> Note Turing works fine with CUDA 9.2. Just compile with sm_61 and it will
> run on the RTX cards no problem. Note AMBER 18 needs a few tweaks to get
> optimum performance on RTX cards though. A patch will be coming shortly.
>
> All the best
> Ross
>
> > On Oct 31, 2018, at 10:31 AM, Nikolay N. Kuzmich <nnkuzmich.gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Amber users and developers,
> >
> > is there any information available if upgrading Cuda driver to 10.0
> version
> > improves the MD perfomance of GeForce 1080Ti GTX card for Amber18?
> > I use OpenSuse Leap 15 Linux.
> > Or is CUDA 10.0 driver just something Turing architecture-specific ?
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Nick
> >
> > Nikolay Kuzmich
> > Department of Drug Safety,
> > Research Institute of Influenza,
> > WHO National Influenza Centre of Russia,
> > 15/17 Professor Popov St.,
> > Saint-Petersburg
> > _______________________________________________
> > AMBER mailing list
> > AMBER.ambermd.org
> > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Fri Nov 02 2018 - 02:30:02 PDT
