[AMBER] Calcium force fields

From: David A Case <david.case.rutgers.edu>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 07:16:10 -0400

[From Kennie Merz]:

There are 12-6 and 12-6-4 Ca(II) nonbonded parameters available, but they were designed to reproduce aqueous phase properties. How they will work with Ca(II) binding to an EF-hand is anyone's guess. This paper from the York lab highlights some of the challenges you might face: York & co-workers JPCB 2015, 119, 15460. Other than that MCPB.py is another way to go to build a bonded model. You have a super interesting problem, but some tuning will be in order if you want to go the nonbonded model route is my guess. Good luck!

Kennie


_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed Jul 18 2018 - 04:30:02 PDT
Custom Search